Download e-book Free Thoughts about Captive Medicine: In defence of Hippocrates

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Free Thoughts about Captive Medicine: In defence of Hippocrates file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Free Thoughts about Captive Medicine: In defence of Hippocrates book. Happy reading Free Thoughts about Captive Medicine: In defence of Hippocrates Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Free Thoughts about Captive Medicine: In defence of Hippocrates at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Free Thoughts about Captive Medicine: In defence of Hippocrates Pocket Guide.

Work gives products—commodities—that end up on shop shelves. Capitalism means full shelves in every shop. Release energy from people! Do you remember the effects of the Corn Law of the nineteenth century? At around the same time in London, in the reading room of the British Museum, Karl Marx was composing his Communist Manifesto commissioned by socialist Engels. It was also at this time that Parliament passed a public health act. The tyranny of the majority can be painful. Do you remember effect of the Soviet Law of Three Spikelets?

Yes, collectivization can be unhealthy. Man should be free from compulsion and free to operate in a free environment—and this includes every aspect of the medical field too. There is no argument against freedom! Free medicine forever!

The Doctor Who Gave Up Drugs: Episode 1 (Medical Documentary) - Real Stories

Political medicine never! These are the questions: Shall we choose freedom or the loss of control of our health and lives? Which system is better? Which brings a bigger fount of plenty—an economy driven by a free market or one that is controlled? Which brings more founts of plenty? Free birth or controlled birth—which system delivers more children? When individual concerns of life and health are in the hands of politicians, politicians think of people in the collective, and individual concerns are not met.

Collectivization never! Free market is the only platform that guarantees personal political freedom and personal medical freedom. If there is no free medical market, patients are controlled and their lives and health are controlled. A free market is the only foundation for every kind of freedom. Any fight over a free market in any country is a fight about personal freedom in those areas. If patients are ill, they are weak, infirm, and much easier to control. To be truly free, patients should fight to be free in four main areas: spiritual, psychical, physical, and economical.

There are no free patients without free doctors. There are no free doctors unless they have their own private consulting rooms. There are no free doctors unless they can follow the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath comes from natural law; in order to be just, constituted law should be aligned with this natural law. Natural law exists in the human soul. The fight about the Hippocratic Oath is a fight about the abolition of slavery. Sovietization of society is enslavement of society in all four areas.

Total control over human beings is also total control over their souls. Captive soul, captive mind, captive body, captive money! Writers, humanists, and liberal politicians fight to save the human soul, and they are spiritual doctors. Breaches of the Hippocratic Oath are the biggest crime and the original cause of evil in medicine. These breaches cause great problems between patients and their doctors.

The Hippocratic Oath is a promise to practice medicine honestly. It has, for hundreds of years, been taken by doctors. It is an ancient, natural, civilized, and humanistic sacrament, which is taken in a solemn ceremony as a way to impress it as a true and deep and serious obligation. It is in the deepest interest of the patient and the doctor that we defend the Hippocratic Oath. Poland and Jacobson published their findings :. The same year, Drs. Kontio, Jikinen, Paunio, and Davidkin published the results of their study , which showed:. Herd immunity can only occur when the herd has lifetime immunity.

Temporary antibody production that repeated boosters fail to address cannot result in herd immunity. Merck initially promised lifetime immunity from a single shot, and the CDC, apparently ignoring the evidence, still bolsters this claim. In a related issue, an unforeseen consequence of MMR vaccination is that. This increases the risk of disease transmission in highly vaccinated populations.

It does more than that; it shifts the risk of disease to a more vulnerable population, who WAS protected before the vaccine was introduced. Vaccine failure, not threats to sue hesitant parents, should be front-page news. Do we really want to repeat the same dysfunctional pattern of denial that started the opioid crisis?

This should be part of any discussion of vaccine policy involving MMR. The case has been ongoing for 9 years, and obviously is a strong enough case that Merck has been unable to have it dismissed. Indeed, the Reuters article discusses the accusation that Merck was stonewalling.

This, too, should be front page news.

Book Preview

The catastrophic reaction itself is not vanishingly rare; reporting the reaction is. Are health officials exaggerating the likelihood of measles complications in order to sell a failing vaccine? This was the year before the first measles vaccine was introduced, well before researchers learned that addressing vitamin A deficiency prevents both measles severity and measles complications, and before the advanced medical care offered today. Even as far back as , before such conveniences as washing machines, the measles death rate was listed at 4. Telling everyone to get more of a failing vaccine with troubling safety issues for some is not going to fix the problems.

It will not stop measles outbreaks. It will result in more, not fewer adverse reactions. Punishing those who refuse to comply because, for whatever reason, they see the problems, only serves to further erode trust in both the government and its vaccine program. Instead, U. Factors affecting vaccine-induced immune response The Mayo researcher, Dr. Ditto mumps vaccination , which produced lower antibody levels in children with asthma compared to children with no asthma. By and large, however, the research group has remained focused on genetic determinants.

Solutions that are no solution Poland and colleagues offer several solutions to the vaccine effectiveness challenges posed by variable immune responses—and the vaccine safety challenges posed by vaccine adverse reactions. Considering the evidence that is accumulating about the dangers of aluminum and other adjuvants , it seems ill-advised to bombard weak-immunity individuals with more of the same. However, it bypasses some of the most critical protections of all—the hard-won legal right to informed consent and the right guaranteed by many states to decline vaccination based on religious or philosophical principles.

Will the public be willing to jettison these protections—walking around with their genome in their pocket or upping their injections of toxic aluminum adjuvants—in exchange for unproven promises of improved safety and effectiveness? Only time will tell. We are witness to an orchestrated frenzy that has been revved-up by vaccine stakeholders — i. Their unified objective is to achieve maximum utilization of vaccines, and total compliance with vaccination schedules set by the government in collaboration with vaccine manufacturers. During the measles outbreak in California in , a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees.

Of the measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in , 73 were identified as vaccine sequences. They generated high public anxiety. This fear mongering led to the demonization of unvaccinated children, who were perceived as the spreaders of disease. Never disclosed to the public, but known to CDC officials is the following evidence that has finally been published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology :.

Of the measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in , 73 were identified as vaccine sequences R. McNall, unpublished data. Rebecca J. McNall, a co-author of the published report, is a CDC official in the Division of Viral Diseases, who had the data proving that the measles outbreak was in part caused by the vaccine.

But this crucial information has been concealed, and continues to be withheld from the public. After all, how many have read the belated disclosure in the Journal of Microbiology? Does anyone fail to see the connection between vaccination and an infectious disease outbreak?

Since October, children and adults contracted mumps at migrant detention facilities across Texas, according to a state health agency. These include immigrants and employees. The Texas cases are not unique! Numerous similar outbreaks of mumps in have occurred in vaccinated children in New York, and in the U. Territory of Guam in CDC Pink Book acknowledges :. The occurrence of measles among previously vaccinated children i. During the measles resurgence, incidence rates for infants were more than twice as high as those in any other age group. The mothers of many infants who developed measles were young, and their measles immunity was most often due to vaccination rather than infection with wild virus.

As a result, a smaller amount of antibody was transferred across the placenta to the fetus, compared with antibody transfer from mothers who had higher antibody titers resulting from wild-virus infection. The lower quantity of antibody [in the vaccine] resulted in immunity that waned more rapidly, making infants susceptible at a younger age than in the past. CDC further acknowledges that: despite relatively high vaccination rates, small measles outbreaks continue to occur. Since , most of these outbreaks were imported or linked to importation from other countries.

Two congressional hearings called for enforcement of mandatory childhood vaccination, citing the current measles outbreaks. The committees invited only vaccine promoters who endorsed mandatory vaccination of children, but not of adults. February 27th hearing, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce :. Fauci is on record stating:.

Mercury in Vaccines

Outbreaks of measles occur when measles gets into these communities of unvaccinated people. The only way to protect against measles is to get vaccinated. Boyle, CEO of the Immune Deficiency Foundation whose core benefactors are bio-pharma corporations upped the decibel, declaring:.

The focus of concern and public anger should be directed at the failure of the public health establishment to methodically investigate the contributing cause[s] of the genuine, empirically documented childhood epidemic — the relentless, ever-increasing rise in the number of neurologically injured children has climbed to 1 in 36 in the U. The numbers of those affected is now in the millions. How much of this decline was due to vaccines?

Why did the mortality rate decline so precipitously? If you listen to vaccine promoters, the answer is simple: vaccines saved us. Edward H. Kass gave a speech to the annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America that would likely get him run out of this same profession today. At the time, Dr. Forty-eight years after Dr.

Of course vaccines saved the world. In his famous speech, Dr. Kass took his infectious disease colleagues to task, warning them that drawing false conclusions about WHY mortality rates had declined so much could cause them to focus on the wrong things. As he explained:. That these are half truths is known but is perhaps not as well known as it should be. Kass then shared some eye-opening charts with his colleagues.

Kass shared in But wait a minute, Dr. Well, in , the measles vaccine was just beginning to be rolled out, and as you can clearly see, measles had long since experienced a dramatic decline in mortality. With Pertussis Whooping Cough , he produced a similar chart:. In this case, you can actually see when the Pertussis vaccine was introduced. Kass was trying to make a simple point to his colleagues, but one with profound implications for public health.

Kass pled with his colleagues to be open to understanding WHY infectious diseases had declined so dramatically in the U.

  • wma_media_mentions_archived – WMA – The World Medical Association?
  • Meaning of "aborticide" in the English dictionary.
  • Blue Turning Grey Over You.
  • Free Thoughts About Captive Medicine: In Defence of Hippocrates.
  • Free Thoughts about Captive Medicine: In Defence of Hippocrates.
  • Doctors and nurses 'complicit' in US torture of terrorism suspects;
  • How To Buy Life Insurance On A Budget: An Insiders Guide To Getting The Best Term Life Rates At The Right Coverage Amount!?

Was it nutrition? Sanitary methods? A reduction in home crowding? Luckily for us, Dr. Not only that, but their study warned against the very behavior we are now seeing in the world of vaccines. Namely, they warned that a group of profiteers might take more credit for the results of an intervention vaccines than the intervention deserves, and then use those fake results to create a world where their product must be used by everyone.

Seriously, they predicted that this would happen. The paper makes two points that I really want to highlight, because they are so important. The first one concerns vaccines. They write:. Rather more conservatively, if we attribute some of the subsequent fall in the death rates for pneumonia, influenza, whooping cough, and diphtheria to medical measures, then perhaps 3.

Said differently, at least Responsibility for this decline is often claimed by, or ascribed to, the present-day major beneficiaries of this prevailing explanation. In , Dr. In , Drs. In , CDC scientists reconfirmed all this data, but also provided more insight into the things that actually have led to declines in mortality.

Clean water. Safe food. These were the primary reasons mortality declined so precipitously. At least according to the data and published science. As McKinlay and McKinlay warned, if the wrong intervention like vaccines is singled out as the reason Americans and the rest of the first world experienced such a dramatic decrease in mortality in the 20th century, that misinformation can be abused to do things like:. Vaccine promoters will often quote statistics about present-day deaths from infectious diseases that sound deeply alarming. Using examples of a disease like measles, they might explain how many children still die from measles every year, and therefore its gravely important that EVERY American parent vaccinate their child for measles.

Poor nutrition. No plumbing or refrigeration. Bad hygiene practices. Crowded living conditions. This was Dr. In fact, we now have some data that shows vaccinating children living in situations where they have poor nutrition and lack of sanitation can actually do more harm than good:. They found that the data for African children who had been vaccinated with the DTP vaccine:.

No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. DTP is the most widely used vaccine. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus, or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease, it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections. In lay terms, this means that giving an African child the DTP vaccine may make the child sick from other infections. It appears that in Africa, the living conditions are more important than the vaccine as you would very much expect from Dr.

Aaby was a highly regarded vaccine researcher until he published this study in We have another real world example of this phenomenon from the late s. Archie Kalokerinos made a simple discovery, as he explains:. I observed that many infants, after they received routine vaccines like tetanus, diphtheria, polio, whooping cough or whatever, became ill. Some became extremely ill, and in fact some died. It was an observation, It was not a theory. So my first reaction was to look at the reasons why this happened. Of course I found it was more likely to happen in infants who were ill at the time of receiving a vaccine, or infants who had been ill recently, or infants who were incubating an infection.

Of course in the early stages of incubation there is no way whatsoever that anyone can detect the disease. They turn up later on. Furthermore, some of the reactions to the vaccines were not those that were listed in the standard literature. They were very strange reactions indeed. A third observation was that with some of these reactions which normally resulted in death I found that I could reverse them by giving large amounts of vitamin C intramuscularly or intravenously.

One would have expected, of course, that the authorities would take an interest in these observations that resulted in a dramatic drop in the death rate of infants in the area under my control, a very dramatic drop. But instead of taking an interest their reaction was one of extreme hostility. This forced me to look into the question of vaccination further, and the further I looked into it the more shocked I became.

I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instance of these diseases you will realise that this is not so. Dr Kalokerinos also said something in that it appears Dr. We actually knew the truth in the early s, even before the rapid decline in mortality Well ahead of his time, Englishman John Thomas Biggs was the sanitary engineer for his town of Leicester and had to actively respond to outbreaks of smallpox.

More than one hundred years ago, Mr. Biggs discovered what the CDC reaffirmed in Nothing protects from infectious disease like proper sanitation. He explained:. Most people believe that victory over the infectious diseases of the last century came with the invention of immunizations. In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria, and whooping cough, and the others were in decline before vaccines for them became available — the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water.

Their impact was somewhere between Improvement in sanitation and standards of living really did nutrition, living conditions, etc. Did vaccines contribute to a small decrease of certain acute illnesses? Yes, but their relative benefit is often exaggerated to an extreme, and then used to browbeat, guilt, and scare parents. So am I saying no one should vaccinate? Vaccines provide temporary protection from certain acute illnesses. Some matter more than others. Worse, the lie that vaccines saved humanity in the twentieth century has turned many vaccine promoters into zealots, even though their narratives are simply not supported by the facts.

But, by all means, get as many vaccines as you want, I respect your right to make your own medical care choices. There are two excellent resources that I would recommend if you are interested in diving down the rabbit hole of the true history of infectious disease. The first is the amazing book, Dissolving Illusions , by Suzanne Humphries. Anthony Fauci—director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIAID —admitted with a chuckle that he and most of the Committee members sitting before him had uneventfully experienced measles as children and had recovered completely.

These national leaders reaped many benefits by getting measles in childhood—accruing lifelong immunity and protection against cardiovascular disease, among other benefits—but that has not stopped them from fomenting public panic about measles or pushing for more vaccine mandates. This week, the Senate followed up with its own similar hearing. Congressional hearings on vaccine safety in the early s were more balanced, at least allowing multiple viewpoints to be aired if not acted upon. Logically, flares of illness in vaccinated groups should prompt some serious questions about vaccine failure , rather than hostile condemnation of families with legal vaccine exemptions—medical, religious or philosophical.

Many studies illustrate both types of vaccine failure as well as the concerning potential for vaccinated individuals to transmit disease to others. In addition, the index patient—the one who launched the chain of transmission—had received three doses of measles-containing vaccine. Other recent studies highlight an even more troubling ramification of vaccine failure, which has become more apparent with each successive vaccinated generation: vaccination is increasing the number of susceptible individuals in the population over time. In , Korean researchers warned that measles susceptibility is increasing in that country because:.

Other investigators observing the same patterns are scratching their heads. These phenomena do not apply just to measles vaccination but to many other types of vaccines as well. Flu shots also have been shown to make people more susceptible to other severe respiratory viruses. Vaccine failure problems are also well documented with regard to pertussis vaccination. The author, a high-level UCLA researcher who has made a career out of studying pertussis vaccines, describes:.

School officials have emphasized that the outbreak cannot be attributed to the unvaccinated students. Back in , researchers wrote in The New England Journal of Medicine about a pertussis outbreak in vaccinated children in Oregon. The topic of vaccine failure is not new, having been discussed since the earliest days of smallpox vaccination —and modern-day descriptions of vaccine failure continue to multiply.

Merck has also been accused of fraud and negligence related to other vaccines. A recent article in U. In January, , news outlets reported the death of a leading cancer researcher in the UK, who suffered total organ failure not long after receiving a yellow fever YF vaccine. Both the UK and the U. In the early s, news reporters apparently had a bit more leeway to disclose vaccine risks. The UK is no stranger to dramatic stories about YF vaccination gone awry. Yet here it is, recorded in all the pain, misery and anguish for us all to see.

The acute multiple organ system dysfunction suffered by the UK cancer researcher is called yellow fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic disease YEL-AVD. Conservative estimates based on these reports suggest that there may be cases of YEL-AVD per million doses distributed, with cases per million doses in individuals plus years old and as many as per million reported in a study involving a single vaccine lot.

The reviewers then reported being unable to compute an overall rate due to the incomplete information. Combined with the known problem of underreporting of vaccine adverse events, official statistics may significantly underestimate the true incidence of adverse reactions following YF vaccination. Following World Health Organization WHO recommendations, over two dozen countries in Africa and many countries in Latin America and the Caribbean include YF vaccination on their childhood vaccine schedules, generally recommending an initial shot at 9 to 12 months of age and a booster every 10 years.

Individuals who suffer reactions may also be less likely to reach health care, making it even less likely that the adverse events will be investigated and published. Although countries like the UK and U. In the s, vaccine scientists started experimenting with YF vaccines prepared from mouse brain cultures and chicken embryos.

YF vaccines are still prepared by culturing YF virus in chicken embryos and adding substances like sorbitol and gelatin as stabilizers. Although there have been a few subsequent tweaks to the manufacturing process, the two substrains used to make yellow fever vaccines today both date back to work carried out by the Rockefeller Institute during World War II.

Associated Name

It remains to be seen whether a tobacco-grown vaccine with strong adjuvants, that could usher in a host of other problems, will prove to be an improvement over the troubling live vaccines currently in use. Republishing Guidelines.


Let me explain:. I hope state activists grab the data for their state, share it with their legislators, and ask a simple question:. Note: this data above is for children, aged months. By the time these kids get into school, the vaccination rate goes even higher. Ask any epidemiologist you know to run these numbers. The trend lines are ALL flat. Since By Jeremy R. On the contrary, the existence of institutionalized biases within the medical establishment and scientific community are well recognized in the scientific literature, and the Congress itself has criticized the endemic corruption within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC and Food and Drug Administration FDA.

For example, we saw how both agencies were criticized by the June report of an investigation initiated by the Committee on Government Reform within the House of Representatives. That investigation touched on a particularly salient example of government corruption and malfeasance: the case of the rotavirus vaccine. Included among the half of ACIP members who had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies while deliberating what CDC policy should be with respect to the rotavirus vaccine was one Dr.

Paul Offit. He also holds the Maurice R. Furthermore, while the FDA instructed Wyeth on specific areas it ought to focus its postmarketing safety studies, the risk of intussusception was not one of them. Researchers monitoring publicly available postmarketing surveillance data nevertheless did pick up on the incoming reports of intussusception after vaccination, and studies were conducted that confirmed the association between vaccination and an increased risk of the intestinal disorder.

Prior to being pulled from the market, the vaccine was administered to half a million children. Surveillance data showed that during its short time in use, there were 98 confirmed reports of vaccine-related intussusception, over half of which required surgery and one of which resulted in death. Instructively, he considered his glaring conflict of interest as a reason only to abstain from voting against the use of the vaccine—not to abstain from voting in favor. The CDC is essentially a marketing and distribution division of the vaccine industry. A reassortant virus is one containing two or more pieces of nucleic acid from different parent viruses, produced by coinfecting a cell with the parent strains.

The simian virus in this case was from a rhesus monkey. Yes, the US government patents vaccine technology and licenses it for a fee to private corporations. The CDC itself maintains contracts with pharmaceutical companies and, excepting influenza vaccines, purchases more than half of the childhood vaccines distributed in the US. With no lack of irony, the way the government tells the story of RotaShield, it is a shining example of how the bureaucracies charged with ensuring vaccine safety are highly effective at doing so.

Numerous studies have since found SV40 to be associated with an increased risk of certain types of cancer in humans, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The FDA publicized this finding on May 6, But rather than advising that RotaTeq, too, be suspended from use until this contamination could be resolved and the threat evaluated, on May 14, the FDA recommended that health care professionals resume use of Rotarix alongside the continued use of RotaTeq on the grounds that there was no known risk to humans from these viruses.

Incidentally, one of the scientific contributions of Maurice R. Hilleman—the former Merck vice president in honor of whom the chair held by Paul Offit was created—was his discovery in that both the live-virus and inactivated polio vaccines in use in the US were contaminated with a monkey virus known as simian virus 40 SV In May the following year, the National Institutes of Health NIH convened to discuss the issue, recommending that the vaccines not be withdrawn from use on the grounds that there was no known risk to humans from the virus.

The reality is that the government approved the first rotavirus vaccine and added it to its list of vaccines children are typically required to get to attend public school despite clinical safety trials having indicated that it might cause intussusception. It should also come as no surprise, then, that after the withdrawal of that first rotavirus vaccine, the FDA approved two more despite both being contaminated with one or more pig viruses.

Also unsurprising is the fact that the CDC pushed the vaccine on the public, given how members of the CDC vaccine advisory committee had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing rotavirus vaccines. The reality is that the government to a very large extent is the vaccine industry. Both the government and industry powerfully influence the direction of science, resulting in an institutionalized bias favoring public vaccine policy and treating vaccination as the solution for an increasing number of communicable diseases, at the opportunity cost of researching alternatives and simply educating people how to strengthen their immune systems naturally, including through proper nutrition, exercise, and avoidance of toxic exposures.

The government also misleads the public about what science tells us about the safety and effectiveness of its recommended vaccines, which can be explained not only by the institutionalized bias, but also by the endemic corruption within the agencies. Jeremy R. Hammond is an independent journalist and analyst, publisher and editor of Foreign Policy Journal , author of several books, and father.

Read more of his writings at JeremyRHammond. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. About 12 million doses are administered to American babies in any given year. However, unless their mothers harbor the virus determined by routine prenatal blood testing , newborns are probably the least likely human beings on the planet at risk of actually getting hepatitis B. Infection risks are also extremely low for young school-age children, but—in all but two states Alabama and South Dakota —three to four doses of hepatitis B vaccine are not only recommended but mandated for preschool attendance, K education or both.

Whereas the young people being vaccinated face little to no chance of hepatitis B infection, the vaccines impose significant risks , including the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, autoimmune illness and even death. In the decade from to when hepatitis B vaccines contained the mercury-based preservative thimerosal , vaccine exposure in early infancy resulted in an estimated 0. In five years before the CDC began pushing for vaccination of all newborns , the nation documented fewer than cases of hepatitis B infection in children under age 14; by , the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System VAERS had received over 23, reports of adverse events related to hepatitis B vaccination in the age group, including nearly deaths.

In congressional testimony in , the father of a five-week-old who died immediately following a hepatitis B shot described a ratio of VAERS reports compared to cases of hepatitis B infection in the age group likely an underestimate due to VAERS underreporting. The legal framework that seemingly permits compulsory childhood vaccination, including hepatitis B vaccine mandates for preschoolers, is astonishingly out-of-date.

These are some of the points made by New York University legal scholar Mary Holland in a far-reaching discussion of hepatitis B vaccine mandates in the Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics , published in As Holland explains, the Supreme Court decision that set the stage for vaccine mandates Jacobson v. Holland finds the constitutionality of hepatitis B vaccine mandates for preschoolers questionable, particularly in light of other legal precedents. At least two factors undermine the presumption of reasonableness, including shockingly inadequate safety testing in the targeted age groups infants and young children and poor long-term efficacy.

We saw in our New York Times case study just how blatantly the media participate in misinforming the public, with health writer Aaron E. But no conspiracy theory is required to explain how it can be that the CDC is misinforming the public about vaccines. The media is just demonstrably serving its usual function, as outlined by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky in their book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media , of advocating government policy rather than doing journalism.

This is not a conspiracy. Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it. Likewise, no conspiracy theory is required to explain how it can be that the government agency charged with formulating public vaccine policy is misinforming the public about vaccine science. Public health officials generally are simply convinced that, in performing their individual function in the mechanisms of government, they are doing good and serving the public interest. Doctors working within the confines of the medical establishment, too, succumb to confirmation bias and fail to question the institutionalized way of doing things.

Studies examining this problem have shown that an alarming proportion of medical literature gets the science wrong. Among the numerous other problems affecting the quality of research are financial conflicts of interests and institutionalized prejudices. As Ioannidis elaborated:. Prejudice may not necessarily have financial roots. Scientists in a given field may be prejudiced purely because of their belief in a scientific theory or commitment to their own findings. Many otherwise seemingly independent, university-based studies may be conducted for no other reason than to give physicians and researchers qualifications for promotion or tenure.

Such nonfinancial conflicts may also lead to distorted reported results and interpretations. Prestigious investigators may suppress via the peer review process the appearance and dissemination of findings that refute their findings, thus condemning their field to perpetuate false dogma. Empirical evidence on expert opinion shows that it is extremely unreliable. That certainly also applies to the CDC, where corruption and conflicts of interest are an endemic problem. In August , the House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform initiated an investigation into federal vaccine policy, the findings of which were reported in June The Senate report named Julie Gerberding as an example of the problem.

Under her leadership, bonuses for the people managing the CDC increased dramatically. On the contrary, that the CDC does so is demonstrable and recognized in the scientific literature. It certainly does not follow from the assumption that government officials in positions of power are acting out of benevolent intent that therefore their policies are not harmful.

The institutionalized confirmation bias and endemic corruption are more than sufficient to explain how it can be that the CDC is misinforming the public about vaccines. Herd immunity is a largely theoretical concept, yet for decades, it has furnished one of the key underpinnings for vaccine mandates in the United States. The public health establishment borrowed the herd immunity concept from pre-vaccine observations of natural disease outbreaks. There is one problem with using herd immunity as a motivator, however—the theory of herd immunity relies on numerous flawed assumptions that, in the real world, do not and cannot justify compulsory vaccination policies.

One of the principal arguments made by Holland and Zachary is that herd immunity is not achievable with modern vaccines.

Capsula Eburnea: Epistle from Hippocrates's Tomb - World Digital Library

In contrast, the artificial immunity engineered by vaccines— administered to children before their immune systems have even had a chance to develop—not infrequently leads to subsequent immune dysfunction and chronic illness. The flawed logic that ignores individual and population differences and pretends that there is no distinction between natural and vaccine-induced immunity has given rise to many troubling vaccine policies, according to Holland and Zachary.

Hepatitis B vaccination offers one example of a disconnect between risk and policy. Whereas hepatitis B is a disease for which only a tiny portion of the U. These include:. One study suggests that lapsed vaccine immunity has led to negative outcomes that are 4. There are numerous examples of this in the published literature. Astonishingly or perhaps not , the solution proposed by most of the researchers who recognize various forms of vaccine failure is…more vaccination.

View Store. Register now to get updates on promotions and. Or Download App. India's fastest online shopping destination. How can we help you? No result found for "OK". Please press enter for search. Visit Help Center. Trending Searches. Cart 0. Item s Added To cart Qty. If you are a new user Register login. Help Center. Exchange offer not applicable. New product price is lower than exchange product price.

Exchange offer is not applicable with this product. Exchange Offer cannot be clubbed with Bajaj Finserv for this product. Please apply exchange offer again. Your item has been added to Shortlist. View All.